Government of Gujarat vs JUNAS ISHA SUMBHANIYA — 522/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020007752026
Filing Number
522/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
522/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185007250429
Police Station
SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JUNAS ISHA SUMBHANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 522/2026 The court convicted the accused, Junas Isha Sumbhaniya, under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive) for recklessly keeping a vehicle on a road, endangering human life. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, citing being from a poor, laboring class with family responsibilities and claiming it was a first offense. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 (or one day simple imprisonment if fine unpaid) and issued a warning against future similar conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 522/2026
Summary of Case 522/2026 The court convicted the accused, Junas Isha Sumbhaniya, under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive) for recklessly keeping a vehicle on a road, endangering human life. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, citing being from a poor, laboring class with family responsibilities and claiming it was a first offense. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 (or one day simple imprisonment if fine unpaid) and issued a warning against future similar conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts