Government of Gujarat vs ASLAM KARIMBHAI BHAYA — 519/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020007722026

Filing Number

519/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

519/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250416

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASLAM KARIMBHAI BHAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case CC NO. 519/2026 The court convicted Aslam Karimbhai Bhaya under IPC Section 285 for recklessly endangering human life by operating a vehicle on a public road in a dangerous manner. The accused pleaded guilty and admitted to the offense; the court considered mitigating factors including his impoverished background, lack of education, and that this was his first offense. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹300, with one day of simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and issued a warning against committing similar offenses in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 519/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CC NO. 519/2026 The court convicted Aslam Karimbhai Bhaya under IPC Section 285 for recklessly endangering human life by operating a vehicle on a public road in a dangerous manner. The accused pleaded guilty and admitted to the offense; the court considered mitigating factors including his impoverished background, lack of education, and that this was his first offense. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹300, with one day of simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and issued a warning against committing similar offenses in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case