Government of Gujarat vs HAMIR MOTIBHAI CHAUHAN — 516/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020007692026

Filing Number

516/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

516/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250407

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HAMIR MOTIBHAI CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 516/2026 The court convicted Hamir Motibhai Chauhan under Section 65(A.P.) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments for unlawful possession of alcohol. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 300 with an alternative simple imprisonment of two days, considering the accused's voluntary confession and mitigating circumstances while exercising its discretionary power to impose lesser punishment than the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 516/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 516/2026 The court convicted Hamir Motibhai Chauhan under Section 65(A.P.) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments for unlawful possession of alcohol. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 300 with an alternative simple imprisonment of two days, considering the accused's voluntary confession and mitigating circumstances while exercising its discretionary power to impose lesser punishment than the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case