Government of Gujarat vs GOPAL MOHANBHAI DABHI — 475/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020007062026

Filing Number

475/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

475/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004252001

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL MOHANBHAI DABHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Khambhaliya convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive) based on his voluntary and willing confession. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment in default) and ordered forfeiture of the relevant property, as the accused did not contest the charges after receiving police documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 475/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Khambhaliya convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive) based on his voluntary and willing confession. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment in default) and ordered forfeiture of the relevant property, as the accused did not contest the charges after receiving police documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case