Government of Gujarat vs SALIMBHAI NURAMAMADBHAI VADAGAMA — 472/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020007032026

Filing Number

472/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

472/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004252000

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SALIMBHAI NURAMAMADBHAI VADAGAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Khambhaliya convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused guilty of voluntarily and knowingly committing the offense, and rejected his defense plea, leading to the conviction and sentencing order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 472/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Khambhaliya convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused guilty of voluntarily and knowingly committing the offense, and rejected his defense plea, leading to the conviction and sentencing order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case