Government of Gujarat vs IMRAN HUSHEN KASMANI — 459/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020006902026

Filing Number

459/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

459/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251875

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IMRAN HUSHEN KASMANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Khambhaliya Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent act with respect to fire) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹500 (rupees five hundred) with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered the forfeiture of the seized articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 459/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Khambhaliya Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent act with respect to fire) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹500 (rupees five hundred) with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered the forfeiture of the seized articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case