Government of Gujarat vs VINOD NATHABHAI VADOLIYA — 449/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 125. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020006802026

Filing Number

449/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

449/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251711

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 125
Gujarat Medical Practitioners Act, 1963 Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINOD NATHABHAI VADOLIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Khambhaliya convicted the accused under IPC Section 125 (Medical Practitioner Act) and Section 30, imposing a fine of ₹3,000 with 7 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court found sufficient evidence to proceed with conviction and sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 449/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Khambhaliya convicted the accused under IPC Section 125 (Medical Practitioner Act) and Section 30, imposing a fine of ₹3,000 with 7 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court found sufficient evidence to proceed with conviction and sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case