Government of Gujarat vs ARVINDBHAI S.O. ANIL THAKUR GANGADHAR BISVAS — 448/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 125. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020006792026

Filing Number

448/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

448/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251357

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 125
Gujarat Medical Practitioners Act, 1963 Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARVINDBHAI S.O. ANIL THAKUR GANGADHAR BISVAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Khambhaliya sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 3,000 (with 7 days simple imprisonment as default) under IPC Section 125 (Medical Practitioner Act Section 30) after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. The court ordered confiscated items to be returned to the rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 448/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Khambhaliya sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 3,000 (with 7 days simple imprisonment as default) under IPC Section 125 (Medical Practitioner Act Section 30) after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. The court ordered confiscated items to be returned to the rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case