Government of Gujarat vs GOVUBHA MURUJI JADEJA — 431/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020006502026

Filing Number

431/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

431/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250371

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVUBHA MURUJI JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused, Gopal Murji Jadeja, under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments for possessing illicit liquor. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) after considering the accused's voluntary confession and the principle that lenient sentences are justified when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist for mitigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 431/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Gopal Murji Jadeja, under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments for possessing illicit liquor. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) after considering the accused's voluntary confession and the principle that lenient sentences are justified when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist for mitigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case