Government of Gujarat vs PARDHURAM IDEVUBHA SUMANIYA Advocate - C R PARMAR — 572/2023

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116(B),81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020006292023

Filing Number

572/2023

Filing Date

09-Feb-2023

Registration No

572/2023

Registration Date

09-Feb-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004220956

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116(B),81,98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARDHURAM IDEVUBHA SUMANIYA Advocate - C R PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 572/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused Pardhuram Devuba Sumaniya under the Prohibition of Illicit Distillation of Alcoholic Liquor Act, 1979 (Sections 65(f), 116(b), 81, 88(2)) for lack of sufficient evidence. While police witnesses supported the prosecution's case based on recovery of illicit liquor and a vehicle from the accused's possession, independent witness testimony was absent, official seals were not properly applied to seized materials, and the investigation lacked procedural rigor, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 21-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 21-Aug-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 31-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 07-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 20-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 23-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 22-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 12-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 25-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 10-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 27-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 13-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 03-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 26-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 09-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 11-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 28-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 17-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 06-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 27-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 18-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 21-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 09-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 09-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 572/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 572/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused Pardhuram Devuba Sumaniya under the Prohibition of Illicit Distillation of Alcoholic Liquor Act, 1979 (Sections 65(f), 116(b), 81, 88(2)) for lack of sufficient evidence. While police witnesses supported the prosecution's case based on recovery of illicit liquor and a vehicle from the accused's possession, independent witness testimony was absent, official seals were not properly applied to seized materials, and the investigation lacked procedural rigor, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case