Government of Gujarat vs DHARAM BHIKHUBHAI RATHOD — 397/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020006072026

Filing Number

397/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

397/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251708

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHARAM BHIKHUBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: CC.No.397/2026 The court convicted respondent Dharam Bhikhubhai Rathod under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b), finding him guilty of possessing and transporting illegal alcohol. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (one-fifty, in currency units) and imposed a fine, with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day if the fine remained unpaid. The judgment emphasized that while sufficient grounds existed for conviction, the court exercised discretion to impose a lenient sentence considering the respondent's circumstances and background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 397/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.397/2026 The court convicted respondent Dharam Bhikhubhai Rathod under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b), finding him guilty of possessing and transporting illegal alcohol. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (one-fifty, in currency units) and imposed a fine, with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day if the fine remained unpaid. The judgment emphasized that while sufficient grounds existed for conviction, the court exercised discretion to impose a lenient sentence considering the respondent's circumstances and background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case