Government of Gujarat vs KESHARISINH RAMSINH JADEJA — 351/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020005552026
Filing Number
351/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
351/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008250419
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KESHARISINH RAMSINH JADEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The court (Khambhaliya ADJ Magistrate Court, Gujarat) convicted the accused, Kesarsinh Ramsinh Jadeja, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b). The accused was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 days (or a fine of Rs. 150) for possessing illicit liquor. The court found the accused guilty based on his voluntary confession during police investigation and imposed the minimum prescribed sentence considering mitigating circumstances and the accused's personal situation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 351/2026
Summary The court (Khambhaliya ADJ Magistrate Court, Gujarat) convicted the accused, Kesarsinh Ramsinh Jadeja, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b). The accused was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 days (or a fine of Rs. 150) for possessing illicit liquor. The court found the accused guilty based on his voluntary confession during police investigation and imposed the minimum prescribed sentence considering mitigating circumstances and the accused's personal situation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts