Government of Gujarat vs DEVASHI BHIKHABHAI GORADIYA — 348/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020005522026

Filing Number

348/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

348/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008250423

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVASHI BHIKHABHAI GORADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case CC.No.348/2026 The court convicted Devashi Bhikhabhai Goradiya under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 (as amended 2016) for an offense related to illicit liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering sufficient and reasonable grounds including the accused's rehabilitation prospects and societal reintegration, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹300 instead of the maximum sentence, with two days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CC.No.348/2026 The court convicted Devashi Bhikhabhai Goradiya under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 (as amended 2016) for an offense related to illicit liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering sufficient and reasonable grounds including the accused's rehabilitation prospects and societal reintegration, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹300 instead of the maximum sentence, with two days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case