Government of Gujarat vs RAJAK ISHAKBHAI BHAYA — 345/2026

Case under Gujarat Fisheries Act, 2003 Section 21(1)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020005492026

Filing Number

345/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

345/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008250417

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Fisheries Act, 2003 Section 21(1)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJAK ISHAKBHAI BHAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under Section 21(1)(c) of the Gujarat Fisheries Act for operating a fishing boat without proper license and violating license conditions. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years and a fine of Rs. 1,500, considering mitigating factors such as his illiteracy, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, while also imposing the punishment as a deterrent against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 345/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 21(1)(c) of the Gujarat Fisheries Act for operating a fishing boat without proper license and violating license conditions. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years and a fine of Rs. 1,500, considering mitigating factors such as his illiteracy, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, while also imposing the punishment as a deterrent against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case