Government of Gujarat vs AMIN JAKUBBHAI SUMBHANIYA — 341/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020005452026
Filing Number
341/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
341/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008250438
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMIN JAKUBBHAI SUMBHANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, finding sufficient evidence during police investigation and the accused's voluntary confession of guilt. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment of 150 rupees (one paisa exceeding rupees) with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's circumstances and applying the principle of lenient sentencing where justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 341/2026
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, finding sufficient evidence during police investigation and the accused's voluntary confession of guilt. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment of 150 rupees (one paisa exceeding rupees) with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's circumstances and applying the principle of lenient sentencing where justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts