Government of Gujarat vs DHIRAJLAL ALIAS GABBAR NANAJIBHAI PAU — 283/2026
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 23rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020004112026
Filing Number
283/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
283/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251503
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
DHIRAJLAL ALIAS GABBAR NANAJIBHAI PAU
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Dhirajlal (alias Gabbar) of charges under Gujarat Excise Act Section 12(a) due to insufficient evidence and lack of corroboration from independent witnesses. The prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the police panchnama (formal record) lacked credibility, and the seized liquor could have been commonly available in the market, making the case against the accused untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Dhirajlal (alias Gabbar) of charges under Gujarat Excise Act Section 12(a) due to insufficient evidence and lack of corroboration from independent witnesses. The prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the police panchnama (formal record) lacked credibility, and the seized liquor could have been commonly available in the market, making the case against the accused untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts