Government of Gujarat vs SANGAM CHAUTHIBHAI RAVAT — 271/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020003982026

Filing Number

271/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260123

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGAM CHAUTHIBHAI RAVAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Sangam Chauthibhai Ravat under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and amendments 2016 (Section 66(1)(b)). The accused was sentenced to imprisonment of one day (simple imprisonment) and a fine of Rs. 150, with the alternative of additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's circumstances, position, and conduct in deciding to impose minimum sentence and fine rather than more severe punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Sangam Chauthibhai Ravat under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and amendments 2016 (Section 66(1)(b)). The accused was sentenced to imprisonment of one day (simple imprisonment) and a fine of Rs. 150, with the alternative of additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's circumstances, position, and conduct in deciding to impose minimum sentence and fine rather than more severe punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case