Government of Gujarat vs BACHUBHAI DHARAMASHIBHAI PARMAR — 269/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020003942026

Filing Number

269/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

269/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004252078

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BACHUBHAI DHARAMASHIBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of CC.No.269/2026 The court convicted respondent Bachubhai Dharmashibhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b), for an offense related to illicit liquor possession. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for one day and imposed a fine of Rs. 150 (with simple imprisonment as default), applying lenient sentencing based on the respondent's personal circumstances, mitigating factors, and principles established in relevant precedents regarding proportionality in punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 269/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CC.No.269/2026 The court convicted respondent Bachubhai Dharmashibhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b), for an offense related to illicit liquor possession. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for one day and imposed a fine of Rs. 150 (with simple imprisonment as default), applying lenient sentencing based on the respondent's personal circumstances, mitigating factors, and principles established in relevant precedents regarding proportionality in punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case