Government of Gujarat vs ASHOK SUNDARLAL VISHVAKARMA — 265/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020003902026

Filing Number

265/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

265/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260020

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK SUNDARLAL VISHVAKARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: CC.No.265/2026 The court convicted Ashok Sundarlal Vishvakarma under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 66(1)(b) and amendments 2016, sentencing him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine. The court found that the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and filed a plea for leniency, which the court considered along with the accused's circumstances to impose a reduced sentence rather than the minimum prescribed punishment. The court exercised its discretionary power to impose a lighter sentence while maintaining that justice serves societal reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 265/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.265/2026 The court convicted Ashok Sundarlal Vishvakarma under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 66(1)(b) and amendments 2016, sentencing him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine. The court found that the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and filed a plea for leniency, which the court considered along with the accused's circumstances to impose a reduced sentence rather than the minimum prescribed punishment. The court exercised its discretionary power to impose a lighter sentence while maintaining that justice serves societal reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case