Government of Gujarat vs LAGDHIRBHAI JESHBHAI BHAN — 250/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020003742026

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004250504

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAGDHIRBHAI JESHBHAI BHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of CC.No.250/2026 The court convicted Lagdhirbhai Jeshbhai Bhan under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1949 (amended 2016) for animal cruelty. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 (three hundred rupees only), with an alternative provision of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The judgment considered the accused's circumstances and mitigating factors while imposing the minimum prescribed penalty to balance justice with rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CC.No.250/2026 The court convicted Lagdhirbhai Jeshbhai Bhan under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1949 (amended 2016) for animal cruelty. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 (three hundred rupees only), with an alternative provision of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The judgment considered the accused's circumstances and mitigating factors while imposing the minimum prescribed penalty to balance justice with rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case