Government of Gujarat vs PRATAP DEVABHAI VAGHELA — 242/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020003542026

Filing Number

242/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

242/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004252051

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRATAP DEVABHAI VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No. 242/2026 The court convicted respondent Pratap Devabhai Vaghela under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendment, Section 65 (A.P.), for illegal possession and sale of liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 (three hundred rupees), with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, exercising its discretion to impose minimum punishment considering the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 242/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No. 242/2026 The court convicted respondent Pratap Devabhai Vaghela under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendment, Section 65 (A.P.), for illegal possession and sale of liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 (three hundred rupees), with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, exercising its discretion to impose minimum punishment considering the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case