Government of Gujarat vs KANUBHA SHIVUBHA RATHOD — 210/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020003162026

Filing Number

210/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

210/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004252125

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANUBHA SHIVUBHA RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the respondent, Kanubha Shivubha Rathod, guilty under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 300 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days. The court applied the principle that while lesser punishment can be imposed when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist, rehabilitation and societal benefit should be considered in sentencing decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the respondent, Kanubha Shivubha Rathod, guilty under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 300 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days. The court applied the principle that while lesser punishment can be imposed when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist, rehabilitation and societal benefit should be considered in sentencing decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case