Government of Gujarat vs GULAB SHANKAR KHARED — 183/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020002682026

Filing Number

183/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

183/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004252117

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GULAB SHANKAR KHARED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: CC.No.183/2026 The court convicted Gulab Shankar Khared under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments of 2016, Section 65 (IPC). The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and filed a petition for reduced sentence. The court found sufficient and justifiable grounds to impose lenient punishment, considering the accused's circumstances and potential for rehabilitation, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 instead of more severe penalties, with 2 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 183/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.183/2026 The court convicted Gulab Shankar Khared under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments of 2016, Section 65 (IPC). The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and filed a petition for reduced sentence. The court found sufficient and justifiable grounds to impose lenient punishment, considering the accused's circumstances and potential for rehabilitation, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 instead of more severe penalties, with 2 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case