Government of Gujarat vs KISHOR SOMABHAI FAFAL — 167/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020002522026

Filing Number

167/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

167/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251746

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KISHOR SOMABHAI FAFAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: CC.No.167/2026 The court convicted respondent Kishor Somabhai Fafal under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments (Section 66(1)(b)) for illegal liquor possession. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested leniency; the court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), exercising discretion to impose minimum sentence based on the defendant's circumstances and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 167/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.167/2026 The court convicted respondent Kishor Somabhai Fafal under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments (Section 66(1)(b)) for illegal liquor possession. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested leniency; the court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), exercising discretion to impose minimum sentence based on the defendant's circumstances and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case