Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYSINH AJITSINH JADEJA — 124/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020001842026

Filing Number

124/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

124/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251502

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYSINH AJITSINH JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: C.C.NO.124-2026 The court convicted Vijaysinh Ajitsinh Jadeja under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for unlawfully possessing a government document. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges and requested leniency, citing his first offense, poverty, and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300, with two days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment, while cautioning against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.NO.124-2026 The court convicted Vijaysinh Ajitsinh Jadeja under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for unlawfully possessing a government document. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges and requested leniency, citing his first offense, poverty, and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300, with two days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment, while cautioning against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case