Government of Gujarat vs MAHESH RUGNATH GOSAI — 121/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020001812026

Filing Number

121/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

121/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251864

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESH RUGNATH GOSAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Mahesh Rugnath Gosai under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended in 2016) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with an alternative imprisonment of two days, taking into account mitigating circumstances and the accused's personal situation to impose a lenient sentence as permitted under precedent law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Mahesh Rugnath Gosai under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended in 2016) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with an alternative imprisonment of two days, taking into account mitigating circumstances and the accused's personal situation to impose a lenient sentence as permitted under precedent law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case