Government of Gujarat vs KESHUNATH RANCHODNATH GOHIL — 32/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000562026

Filing Number

32/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251813

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KESHUNATH RANCHODNATH GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of CC.No.32/2026 The court convicted Keshunath Ranchodnath Gohil under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for an offense related to illicit liquor. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the charge and the court imposed a sentence of Rs. 150 (one hundred fifty rupees) fine, with provision for simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the respondent's circumstances and cooperation while determining the lesser sentence as justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CC.No.32/2026 The court convicted Keshunath Ranchodnath Gohil under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for an offense related to illicit liquor. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the charge and the court imposed a sentence of Rs. 150 (one hundred fifty rupees) fine, with provision for simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the respondent's circumstances and cooperation while determining the lesser sentence as justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case