Government of Gujarat vs DAYALBHAI KESHUBHAI SOLANKI — 30/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000522026

Filing Number

30/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251821

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAYALBHAI KESHUBHAI SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Dayalbhai Keshubhai Solanki under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b) and Amendments 2016 for possessing and consuming alcohol. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 150 (one hundred fifty rupees) with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative, considering the accused's circumstances and mitigating factors while maintaining the deterrent purpose of the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Dayalbhai Keshubhai Solanki under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b) and Amendments 2016 for possessing and consuming alcohol. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 150 (one hundred fifty rupees) with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative, considering the accused's circumstances and mitigating factors while maintaining the deterrent purpose of the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case