Government of Gujarat vs AMITBHAI BHARATBHAI MAHETA — 29/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000502026

Filing Number

29/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251802

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMITBHAI BHARATBHAI MAHETA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Amitbhai Bharatbhai Maheta under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments of 2016, sentencing him to imprisonment of one year and a fine of Rs. 150. The court found that while the accused confessed to the offense voluntarily, considering his circumstances and applying principles of proportionality, it imposed the minimum sentence and fine to allow him a chance for rehabilitation within society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Amitbhai Bharatbhai Maheta under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments of 2016, sentencing him to imprisonment of one year and a fine of Rs. 150. The court found that while the accused confessed to the offense voluntarily, considering his circumstances and applying principles of proportionality, it imposed the minimum sentence and fine to allow him a chance for rehabilitation within society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case