Government of Gujarat vs JESHA KHIMA SINCH — 24/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000452026

Filing Number

24/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

24/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251861

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JESHA KHIMA SINCH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: CC.No.24/2026 The court convicted respondent Jesha Khima Singh under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended in 2016), Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and the court, considering mitigating circumstances and the accused's background, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 150 (rupees one hundred fifty) fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, finding sufficient and justified reasons for reduced sentencing to allow the accused rehabilitation in society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 24/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.24/2026 The court convicted respondent Jesha Khima Singh under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended in 2016), Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and the court, considering mitigating circumstances and the accused's background, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 150 (rupees one hundred fifty) fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, finding sufficient and justified reasons for reduced sentencing to allow the accused rehabilitation in society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case