Government of Gujarat vs ANVAR MAMADBHAI CHAMADIYA — 12/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020000192026
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
02-Jan-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
02-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185007250360
Police Station
SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANVAR MAMADBHAI CHAMADIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary of Case 12/2026 The court convicted Anvar Mamadbhai Chamadiya under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and Amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (in place of imprisonment). The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's circumstances and conduct, imposing reduced punishment while acknowledging the court's discretion to impose lesser sentences when justified by special circumstances and reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2026
Summary of Case 12/2026 The court convicted Anvar Mamadbhai Chamadiya under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and Amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (in place of imprisonment). The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's circumstances and conduct, imposing reduced punishment while acknowledging the court's discretion to impose lesser sentences when justified by special circumstances and reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts