Government of Gujarat vs MANU JUMA PARMAR — 10/2026
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020000172026
Filing Number
10/2026
Filing Date
02-01-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
02-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185007250320
Police Station
SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANU JUMA PARMAR
BACHU BAHADUR PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 06-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 10/2026 The court convicted Manu Juma Parmar and Bachu Bahadur Parmar under IPC Section 275 (Adulteration of Foodstuff) for possessing adulterated sugar at a public place. The defendants voluntarily confessed to the offense and provided truthful statements. Considering their status as economically disadvantaged laborers, first-time offenders, family responsibilities, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence: each defendant fined ₹300 with alternate 5-day imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 10/2026 The court convicted Manu Juma Parmar and Bachu Bahadur Parmar under IPC Section 275 (Adulteration of Foodstuff) for possessing adulterated sugar at a public place. The defendants voluntarily confessed to the offense and provided truthful statements. Considering their status as economically disadvantaged laborers, first-time offenders, family responsibilities, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence: each defendant fined ₹300 with alternate 5-day imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts