Government of Gujarat vs MANU JUMA PARMAR — 10/2026

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000172026

Case disposed

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

02-01-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

02-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250320

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 [SECTION 1 18] Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MANU JUMA PARMAR

BACHU BAHADUR PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

06-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of Case 10/2026 The court convicted Manu Juma Parmar and Bachu Bahadur Parmar under IPC Section 275 (Adulteration of Foodstuff) for possessing adulterated sugar at a public place. The defendants voluntarily confessed to the offense and provided truthful statements. Considering their status as economically disadvantaged laborers, first-time offenders, family responsibilities, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence: each defendant fined ₹300 with alternate 5-day imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 10/2026 The court convicted Manu Juma Parmar and Bachu Bahadur Parmar under IPC Section 275 (Adulteration of Foodstuff) for possessing adulterated sugar at a public place. The defendants voluntarily confessed to the offense and provided truthful statements. Considering their status as economically disadvantaged laborers, first-time offenders, family responsibilities, and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence: each defendant fined ₹300 with alternate 5-day imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case