Government of Gujarat vs UDAYSINH ALIAS RAMUBHAI HARACHARANBHAI KUSHAVAHA Advocate - D V SAYANI — 4/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000112026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250369

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UDAYSINH ALIAS RAMUBHAI HARACHARANBHAI KUSHAVAHA Advocate - D V SAYANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Udaysinh alias Ramubhai Haracharanbhai Kushavaha under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for unlawfully carrying a licensed revolver in public. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing poverty, lack of education, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court sentenced him to three months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 300, noting this was his first offense while imposing conditions to prevent future criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Udaysinh alias Ramubhai Haracharanbhai Kushavaha under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for unlawfully carrying a licensed revolver in public. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing poverty, lack of education, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court sentenced him to three months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 300, noting this was his first offense while imposing conditions to prevent future criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case