Government of Gujarat vs GOTAM PRAVINBHAI SHERAJI Advocate - D V SAYANI — 3/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000102026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250368

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOTAM PRAVINBHAI SHERAJI Advocate - D V SAYANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused, Gotam Pravinbhai Sheraji, under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for committing a scheduled offense. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges, and considering mitigating factors such as being a first-time offender from a poor background with family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with imprisonment of two days as an alternative, while issuing a warning against future criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Gotam Pravinbhai Sheraji, under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for committing a scheduled offense. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges, and considering mitigating factors such as being a first-time offender from a poor background with family responsibilities, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with imprisonment of two days as an alternative, while issuing a warning against future criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case