Government of Gujarat vs ANAVAR KASAM SHEKH — 2/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000092026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250372

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANAVAR KASAM SHEKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Anavar Kasam Shekh under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments, Section 66(1)(b), after he confessed to the offense. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) with the option of reduced sentence and fine considering his circumstances and rehabilitation potential, balancing justice with societal reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Anavar Kasam Shekh under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments, Section 66(1)(b), after he confessed to the offense. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) with the option of reduced sentence and fine considering his circumstances and rehabilitation potential, balancing justice with societal reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case