Government of Gujarat vs BHAVUBHA NAVUBHA CHUDASAMA Advocate - N A MUNDRA — 1/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020000082026

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250376

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVUBHA NAVUBHA CHUDASAMA Advocate - N A MUNDRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused, Bhavubha Navubha Chudasama, under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, finding him guilty of illegal liquor possession. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees (one paisa excess) with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's circumstances and applying principles of proportionate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Bhavubha Navubha Chudasama, under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, finding him guilty of illegal liquor possession. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees (one paisa excess) with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's circumstances and applying principles of proportionate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case