Mashri Mandanbhai Gojiya vs Karna Aalabhai Kandoriya Advocate - P D BUDDHBHATTI — 26/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJDW010011192025

Filing Number

26/2025

Filing Date

26-Dec-2025

Registration No

26/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mashri Mandanbhai Gojiya

    Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karna Aalabhai Kandoriya Advocate - P D BUDDHBHATTI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The High Court of Gujarat admitted the petitioner's appeal seeking to waive the 105-day delay in filing an appeal against a trial court judgment dated 29/07/2025. The court found no intentional or inexcusable negligence caused the delay, and granting the appeal would not prejudice the respondent, thereby justifying condonation of the delay to advance substantial justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Reply

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Gujarat admitted the petitioner's appeal seeking to waive the 105-day delay in filing an appeal against a trial court judgment dated 29/07/2025. The court found no intentional or inexcusable negligence caused the delay, and granting the appeal would not prejudice the respondent, thereby justifying condonation of the delay to advance substantial justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case