GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Hushen Harunbhai Bhaya Advocate - T J VITHALANI — 69/2025
Case under The Juvenile Justice (care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 Section 101. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJDW010007822025
Filing Number
69/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
69/2025
Registration Date
10-09-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185005240976
Police Station
MITHAPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. B S JADEJA
Respondent(s)
Hushen Harunbhai Bhaya Advocate - T J VITHALANI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 21-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 69/2025 The High Court dismissed the Government of Gujarat's criminal appeal challenging a Juvenile Justice Board's order that granted bail to the respondent (an accused advocate). The court found the Board's decision lawful and proper, holding that the Board correctly applied the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 considerations regarding the accused's age, nature of offense, and rehabilitation prospects. The court affirmed that no legal grounds existed to set aside the bail order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 69/2025 The High Court dismissed the Government of Gujarat's criminal appeal challenging a Juvenile Justice Board's order that granted bail to the respondent (an accused advocate). The court found the Board's decision lawful and proper, holding that the Board correctly applied the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 considerations regarding the accused's age, nature of offense, and rehabilitation prospects. The court affirmed that no legal grounds existed to set aside the bail order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts