Heirs of Aher Vajabhai Kubhabhai(Legal Heir) vs Heirs of Aher Vajabhai Kumbhabbhai — 14/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJDW010002992025
Filing Number
14/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
16-04-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Heirs of Aher Vajabhai Kubhabhai(Legal Heir)
Adv. A G KATARIA1.
Heirs of Hamir Vajabhai(Legal Heir) 1.1.
Sumat Hamirbhai Chavda
Adv. A G KATARIA1.1.
Karshan Hamirbhai Chavda
Adv. A G KATARIA1.1.
Parbat Hamirbhai Chavda
Adv. A G KATARIA1.1.
Hardas Hamirbhai Chavda
Adv. A G KATARIA
Respondent(s)
Heirs of Aher Vajabhai Kumbhabbhai
Hearing History
Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 28-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Regular Civil Appeal No. 14/2025 Court Decision: The appellate court allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's judgment. The court held that the heirs of Hamir Vajabhai (appellants) have valid inheritance rights to the disputed property in Khanbaliya taluka and are entitled to their share. The case was remitted to the trial court for reconsideration with specific documentary evidence (Marks 38/2 and 38/3) to be admitted and arguments heard afresh before delivering a fresh decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Regular Civil Appeal No. 14/2025 Court Decision: The appellate court allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's judgment. The court held that the heirs of Hamir Vajabhai (appellants) have valid inheritance rights to the disputed property in Khanbaliya taluka and are entitled to their share. The case was remitted to the trial court for reconsideration with specific documentary evidence (Marks 38/2 and 38/3) to be admitted and arguments heard afresh before delivering a fresh decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts