Alabhai Vaghabhai Ayar vs Vijay Bhikhabhai Chavda Advocate - A A MUNDRA — 22/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJDW010002632026

Filing Number

22/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

7-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Alabhai Vaghabhai Ayar

    Adv. D J BHARVADIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Bhikhabhai Chavda Advocate - A A MUNDRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of CR.APPEAL NO.22/2026 The appellants and respondent reached an amicable settlement, which the court recorded and approved. The court directed the respondent to pay the appellant a specified amount as per the settlement terms within 30 days. The trial court's judgment in Criminal Case No. 3058/2023 regarding conviction and punishment was set aside, and criminal charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act were quashed. The appellant was directed to deposit court costs and comply with the settlement conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CR.APPEAL NO.22/2026 The appellants and respondent reached an amicable settlement, which the court recorded and approved. The court directed the respondent to pay the appellant a specified amount as per the settlement terms within 30 days. The trial court's judgment in Criminal Case No. 3058/2023 regarding conviction and punishment was set aside, and criminal charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act were quashed. The appellant was directed to deposit court costs and comply with the settlement conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case