Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel vs Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya(Partner of Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.) Advocate - J M SAGATHIYA — 21/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJDW010002612026
Filing Number
21/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel
Adv. S H JADEJA
Respondent(s)
Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya(Partner of Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.) Advocate - J M SAGATHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court approved a settlement agreement between petitioner Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel and respondent Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya (Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.), recorded in Appeal Case No. 21/2026. The respondent agreed to pay the agreed amount to the appellant under Section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the appellant was acquitted under Sections 138 and 147 of the same act. Additionally, the trial court's order regarding detention and wages (Case No. 530/2023) was set aside, with the appellant required to deposit the cost amount within 30 days or face contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court approved a settlement agreement between petitioner Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel and respondent Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya (Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.), recorded in Appeal Case No. 21/2026. The respondent agreed to pay the agreed amount to the appellant under Section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the appellant was acquitted under Sections 138 and 147 of the same act. Additionally, the trial court's order regarding detention and wages (Case No. 530/2023) was set aside, with the appellant required to deposit the cost amount within 30 days or face contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts