Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel vs Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya(Partner of Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.) Advocate - J M SAGATHIYA — 21/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJDW010002612026

Case disposed

Filing Number

21/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

21/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel

Adv. S H JADEJA

Respondent(s)

Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya(Partner of Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.) Advocate - J M SAGATHIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court approved a settlement agreement between petitioner Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel and respondent Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya (Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.), recorded in Appeal Case No. 21/2026. The respondent agreed to pay the agreed amount to the appellant under Section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the appellant was acquitted under Sections 138 and 147 of the same act. Additionally, the trial court's order regarding detention and wages (Case No. 530/2023) was set aside, with the appellant required to deposit the cost amount within 30 days or face contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

The court approved a settlement agreement between petitioner Keshavji Pragajibhai Patel and respondent Govind Devabhai Bahrvadiya (Om Saairam Stone Crusher Co.), recorded in Appeal Case No. 21/2026. The respondent agreed to pay the agreed amount to the appellant under Section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the appellant was acquitted under Sections 138 and 147 of the same act. Additionally, the trial court's order regarding detention and wages (Case No. 530/2023) was set aside, with the appellant required to deposit the cost amount within 30 days or face contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case