GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Vijaysinh Kalubha Jadeja — 62/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001812026

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

7-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

4071

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijaysinh Kalubha Jadeja

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Vijaysinh Kalubha Jadeja (62/2026) The National Court dismissed criminal charges against respondent Vijaysinh Kalubha Jadeja under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that while the accused allegedly failed to deposit electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the designated authority, the procedural requirements under Section 152 of the Act were not properly followed, rendering the prosecution defective. Accordingly, the court acquitted the respondent of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Vijaysinh Kalubha Jadeja (62/2026) The National Court dismissed criminal charges against respondent Vijaysinh Kalubha Jadeja under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that while the accused allegedly failed to deposit electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the designated authority, the procedural requirements under Section 152 of the Act were not properly followed, rendering the prosecution defective. Accordingly, the court acquitted the respondent of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case