GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Bhanuben Govindbhai Chavda — 56/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
SMRY - SUMMARY
CNR: GJDW010001752026
Filing Number
56/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
7-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3878
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhanuben Govindbhai Chavda
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission upheld a finding that respondent Bhanuben Govindbhai Chavda committed unauthorized billing practices under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, involving inflated electricity charges and compounding fees deposited with the electricity company. The court approved the investigation report recommending prosecution under Section 152 of the Act and ordered the respondent's acquittal from the first information report filed under Section 135, dismissing the government's appeal dated March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2026
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission upheld a finding that respondent Bhanuben Govindbhai Chavda committed unauthorized billing practices under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, involving inflated electricity charges and compounding fees deposited with the electricity company. The court approved the investigation report recommending prosecution under Section 152 of the Act and ordered the respondent's acquittal from the first information report filed under Section 135, dismissing the government's appeal dated March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts