GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai — 54/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001732026

Case disposed

Filing Number

54/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

3715

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai

Hearing History

Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai (54/2026) The National Court discharged respondent Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai from charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of the primary offense. The court approved the investigation report filed under Section 152 IPC which recommended closure of proceedings, noting that while the respondent may have deposited electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the authorized company, the prerequisites for establishing the initial offense under Section 135 were not met. Court: National Court, Khambhaliya | Judge: Samir Vinodchandra Vyas (Special Judge) | Date: 14 March 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai (54/2026) The National Court discharged respondent Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai from charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of the primary offense. The court approved the investigation report filed under Section 152 IPC which recommended closure of proceedings, noting that while the respondent may have deposited electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the authorized company, the prerequisites for establishing the initial offense under Section 135 were not met. Court: National Court, Khambhaliya | Judge: Samir Vinodchandra Vyas (Special Judge) | Date: 14 March 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case