GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai — 54/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001732026

Filing Number

54/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

7-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3715

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai (54/2026) The National Court discharged respondent Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai from charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of the primary offense. The court approved the investigation report filed under Section 152 IPC which recommended closure of proceedings, noting that while the respondent may have deposited electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the authorized company, the prerequisites for establishing the initial offense under Section 135 were not met. Court: National Court, Khambhaliya | Judge: Samir Vinodchandra Vyas (Special Judge) | Date: 14 March 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai (54/2026) The National Court discharged respondent Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai from charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of the primary offense. The court approved the investigation report filed under Section 152 IPC which recommended closure of proceedings, noting that while the respondent may have deposited electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the authorized company, the prerequisites for establishing the initial offense under Section 135 were not met. Court: National Court, Khambhaliya | Judge: Samir Vinodchandra Vyas (Special Judge) | Date: 14 March 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case