GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai — 54/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
SMRY - SUMMARY
CNR: GJDW010001732026
Filing Number
54/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
3715
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai
Hearing History
Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai (54/2026) The National Court discharged respondent Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai from charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of the primary offense. The court approved the investigation report filed under Section 152 IPC which recommended closure of proceedings, noting that while the respondent may have deposited electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the authorized company, the prerequisites for establishing the initial offense under Section 135 were not met. Court: National Court, Khambhaliya | Judge: Samir Vinodchandra Vyas (Special Judge) | Date: 14 March 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai (54/2026) The National Court discharged respondent Ishak Ibrahim Harun Belai from charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of the primary offense. The court approved the investigation report filed under Section 152 IPC which recommended closure of proceedings, noting that while the respondent may have deposited electricity bill amounts and compounding charges with the authorized company, the prerequisites for establishing the initial offense under Section 135 were not met. Court: National Court, Khambhaliya | Judge: Samir Vinodchandra Vyas (Special Judge) | Date: 14 March 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts