GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Kanakba Indrasinh Jadeja — 49/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001682026

Filing Number

49/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

7-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1257

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kanakba Indrasinh Jadeja

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The National Lok Adalat (National Public Interest Arbitration Court) in Khambhaliya disposed of Case 49/2026 on March 14, 2026, involving charges against Kanakba Indrasinh Jadeja under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (Sections 135 and 152). The court found that the respondent had deposited the outstanding electricity bill amount and compounding charges with the authorized company representative, and accordingly acquitted him of the charges under Section 135 while approving the settlement report filed under Section 152 of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The National Lok Adalat (National Public Interest Arbitration Court) in Khambhaliya disposed of Case 49/2026 on March 14, 2026, involving charges against Kanakba Indrasinh Jadeja under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (Sections 135 and 152). The court found that the respondent had deposited the outstanding electricity bill amount and compounding charges with the authorized company representative, and accordingly acquitted him of the charges under Section 135 while approving the settlement report filed under Section 152 of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case