M/s.A.G.Pabari and Co. vs M/s. Ravi Enterprise Advocate - B H CHOTAI, J D CHHETARIYA — 1/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
TMSUIT - TRADE MARK SUIT
CNR: GJDW010001542021
Filing Number
1/2021
Filing Date
18-Mar-2021
Registration No
1/2021
Registration Date
18-Mar-2021
Court
DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
7-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s.A.G.Pabari and Co.
Adv. R H BHANSALI, V V KANABAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/s. Ravi Enterprise Advocate - B H CHOTAI, J D CHHETARIYA
Case History
-
22-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendant's application under Order-7, Rule-11(D) of the CPC challenging the maintainability of the plaintiff's trademark infringement suit filed under Section 142 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 and Section 60 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The court found the plaintiff had properly pleaded a cause of action for groundless and illegal threats, the disputed issues were triable matters better suited for the main trial, and the defendant was barred by the principle of estoppel from re-agitating issues already decided during interim injunction proceedings. The defendant was ordered to pay compensatory costs of Rs. 10,000 within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Jul-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-May-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2025
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Jul-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-May-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Jan-2024
Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2023
Reply To Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Jun-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Apr-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2023
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Dec-2022
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2022
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Oct-2022
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2022
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2022
OrderView PDF
-
30-Aug-2022
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2022
Order On Injuction Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Jul-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-May-2022
Reply To Counter Claim
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Mar-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
01-Jan-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Nov-2021
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2021
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Jun-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2021
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2021
SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendant's application under Order-7, Rule-11(D) of the CPC challenging the maintainability of the plaintiff's trademark infringement suit filed under Section 142 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 and Section 60 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The court found the plaintiff had properly pleaded a cause of action for groundless and illegal threats, the disputed issues were triable matters better suited for the main trial, and the defendant was barred by the principle of estoppel from re-agitating issues already decided during interim injunction proceedings. The defendant was ordered to pay compensatory costs of Rs. 10,000 within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts