GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Amina Irfan Bhaya — 34/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001522026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

419

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amina Irfan Bhaya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Amina Irfan Bhaya (34/2026) The National Lok Adalat court in Khambhaliya dismissed charges against Amina Irfan Bhaya under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, after finding that she had already paid the outstanding electricity bills and compounding charges to the concerned authority during investigation. The court held that since the primary offense under Section 152 of the Act had been settled through payment, the first information report could not proceed, warranting discharge of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Amina Irfan Bhaya (34/2026) The National Lok Adalat court in Khambhaliya dismissed charges against Amina Irfan Bhaya under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, after finding that she had already paid the outstanding electricity bills and compounding charges to the concerned authority during investigation. The court held that since the primary offense under Section 152 of the Act had been settled through payment, the first information report could not proceed, warranting discharge of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case