GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Rafik Mamadbhai Ghavda — 25/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001432026

Filing Number

25/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2063

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rafik Mamadbhai Ghavda

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Rafik Mamadbhai Ghavda (25/2026) The National Lok Adalat court ordered the discharge of the respondent, Rafik Mamadbhai Ghavda, from charges under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that while the respondent had deposited the electricity bill amount and compounding charges with the authorized electricity company official during investigation, a first information report was subsequently filed under Section 152 of the Act. The court determined that since the compounding conditions were satisfied, the FIR should be quashed and the respondent discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Rafik Mamadbhai Ghavda (25/2026) The National Lok Adalat court ordered the discharge of the respondent, Rafik Mamadbhai Ghavda, from charges under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that while the respondent had deposited the electricity bill amount and compounding charges with the authorized electricity company official during investigation, a first information report was subsequently filed under Section 152 of the Act. The court determined that since the compounding conditions were satisfied, the FIR should be quashed and the respondent discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case