GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Vala Kana Karthiya — 19/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001352026

Filing Number

19/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

148

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vala Kana Karthiya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 19/2026 The National Lok Adalat court in Khambhaliya dismissed criminal charges against the respondent Vala Kana Karthiya under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding that the accused had paid the outstanding electricity bills and compounding charges to the electricity company during investigation. The court held that since the first offense under Section 152 of the Act had been compounded and the accused had made full restitution, prosecution under Section 135 could not proceed, and the accused was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 19/2026 The National Lok Adalat court in Khambhaliya dismissed criminal charges against the respondent Vala Kana Karthiya under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, finding that the accused had paid the outstanding electricity bills and compounding charges to the electricity company during investigation. The court held that since the first offense under Section 152 of the Act had been compounded and the accused had made full restitution, prosecution under Section 135 could not proceed, and the accused was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case