GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Ikbal Hushenbhai Hingora — 6/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
SMRY - SUMMARY
CNR: GJDW010001212026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
7-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
234
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ikbal Hushenbhai Hingora
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ikbal Hushenbhai Hingora (Case 6/2026) The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission discharged Ikbal Hushenbhai Hingora from a case filed under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, after finding that the initial complaint regarding unauthorized electricity bill charges and compounding fees had been properly settled. The court ordered the case to be withdrawn based on the TDS Officer's report confirming the accused's liability under Section 152 of the Act, and granted relief to the respondent by dismissing the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ikbal Hushenbhai Hingora (Case 6/2026) The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission discharged Ikbal Hushenbhai Hingora from a case filed under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, after finding that the initial complaint regarding unauthorized electricity bill charges and compounding fees had been properly settled. The court ordered the case to be withdrawn based on the TDS Officer's report confirming the accused's liability under Section 152 of the Act, and granted relief to the respondent by dismissing the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts